August 20, 2009

You are currently browsing the daily archive for August 20, 2009.

This is all over the news and “the tubes”, but just in case you haven’t seen it:

WASHINGTON — Tom Ridge, the first secretary of homeland security, asserts in a new book that he was pressured by top advisers to President George W. Bush to raise the national threat level just before the 2004 election in what he suspected was an effort to influence the vote.

Of course, that the criminal Bush cabal manipulated terrorized a frightened populace with their constant screams of “Terror! Terror! Terror!” isn’t really news to anyone who reads this blog…

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags:

Study Reveals Mercury Contamination in Fish Nationwide

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Scientists detected mercury contamination in every fish sampled in 291 streams across the country, according to a U.S. Geological Survey study released today.

About a quarter of these fish were found to contain mercury at levels exceeding the criterion for the protection of people who consume average amounts of fish, established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. More than two-thirds of the fish exceeded the U.S. EPA level of concern for fish-eating mammals.

“This study shows just how widespread mercury pollution has become in our air, watersheds, and many of our fish in freshwater streams,” said Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar. “This science sends a clear message that our country must continue to confront pollution, restore our nation’s waterways, and protect the public from potential health dangers.”

Some of the highest levels of mercury in fish were found in the tea-colored or “blackwater” streams in North and South Carolina, Georgia, Florida and Louisiana — areas associated with relatively undeveloped forested watersheds containing abundant wetlands compared to the rest of the country. High levels of mercury in fish also were found in relatively undeveloped watersheds in the Northeast and the Upper Midwest. Elevated levels are noted in areas of the Western United States affected by mining. Complete findings of the USGS report, as well as additional detailed studies in selected streams, are available online.

For a national listing of fish advisories from the Environmental Protection Agency, click here.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: ,

but we think we’re going straight

It’s true, people who are lost really do walk in circles — very wobbly circles. That’s from a study in today’s issue of the journal Current Biology.

Researches at the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics in Germany attached GPS locators to people and then set them to walking for several hours in the Sahara desert in Tunisia and the Bienwald forest in Germany.

Walkers were only able to continue in a straight line when they could see either the sun or the moon. As soon as those direction indicators were hidden by clouds, the walkers started going in circles — without even noticing that’s what they were doing and convinced they were still going straight ahead.

The walkers sometimes veered left and sometimes right. The researchers at the Multisensory Perception and Action Group think all that rambling around was the result of increasing uncertainty on the walkers part about where straight ahead was.

In the past, one explanation for why people went in circles was that one leg was longer or stronger than the other, making them tend to walk in one direction or the other, says researcher Jan Souman. To test that idea the researchers blindfolded their walkers to take away visual cues. But that caused people to walking in even smaller circles, sometimes as small as 65 feet in diameter, making the length or strength or their legs an unlikely source of the veering off.

There’s gotta be a political message, perhaps about the squishy middle, there somewhere.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: ,

87) “Highway 61 Revisited”
Soloist: Johnny Winter
Album: Second Winter (Columbia, 1969)

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags:

I just saw a headline saying “Hurricane Bill weakening”.

Is it just me, or is “Bill” a bad name for a hurricane? Reminds me of an old joke. “What did the duck say to the pharmacist? Put it on my bill.”

If the hurricane bill is weakening, is that news twice as good?

Apparently, I haven’t had enough coffee, yet…

(I didn’t want to create a “weak attempt at humor” tag for this post.)

Try the veal.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: