Americans’ Views on Role of Government in Health Care, Entitlement Reform and Partisanship
January 19, 2013 in Uncategorized by Uniformityville_horror | 4 comments
NORC at University of Chicago releases Election Survey Addressing Americans’ Views on Role of Government in Health Care, Entitlement Reform and Partisanship
“1/18/2013, Bethesda, MD. – Today, the independent research organization NORC at the University of Chicago released the new report, 2012 NORC Presidential Election Study: American’s Views on Entitlement Reform and Health Care. Results from this survey suggest that substantial majorities of the American public prefer the status quo on most provisions in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and on entitlements such as Social Security and Medicare. However, most Americans are not in favor of the status quo on partisanship and prefer that their own representatives work with others and make compromises, even those that include policies respondents dislike. ”
Please continue to read on link provided.
http://www.norc.org/NewsEventsPublications/PressReleases/Pages/americans-views-on-entitlement-reform-and-health-care.aspx
-
Uniformityville_horror on January 19, 2013 at 12:31 am
NORC at University of Chicago releases Election Survey Addressing Americans’ Views on Role of Government in Health Care, Entitlement Reform and Partisanship
1/18/2013, Bethesda, MD. – Today, the independent research organization NORC at the University of Chicago released the new report, 2012 NORC Presidential Election Study: American’s Views on Entitlement Reform and Health Care. Results from this survey suggest that substantial majorities of the American public prefer the status quo on most provisions in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and on entitlements such as Social Security and Medicare. However, most Americans are not in favor of the status quo on partisanship and prefer that their own representatives work with others and make compromises, even those that include policies respondents dislike.
Health Care
“Even though we found that senior citizens tended to be ‘health-care conservatives’ I was surprised that they are not that enthusiastic about the government’s role in their own existing government-provided health insurance programs,” said Dr. Andrea Campbell, political science professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “Only 60 percent of seniors say the government should pay for health care for all Americans over 65, compared to three-quarters of those under 65. Only 53 percent of seniors said the government should cover drug bills for senior citizens. Even two-thirds to three-quarters of younger respondents surveyed think the government should cover senior citizens drug bills.”The report also addressed specific provisions in the ACA. Almost 70 percent of respondents favor the requirement that insurance companies cover children on their parent’s insurance plans through age 25. A majority support the government requiring states to expand Medicaid, a provision of the ACA that the Supreme Court struck down. On the other hand, only 39 percent of Americans support the requirement that all people buy health insurance. Republicans are less supportive than Democrats of all provisions of the ACA.
Entitlement Reform
On the issue of entitlement reform, the survey found that approximately 60 percent of respondents favor traditional Social Security over a program that would allow workers to invest the taxes themselves. More than 65 percent favor traditional Medicare over a program that would give workers a specific amount of money to spend on either private or government health insurance.The survey results found that 76 percent of self-identified Democrats strongly support Social Security, and 77 percent of self-identified Democrats support Medicare, both in their traditional forms. On the other side of the aisle, 60 percent of Republicans, favor replacing Social Security with a defined contribution plan and 44 percent favor changing Medicare to a system supporting the purchase of private or government health insurance.
“Democrats as a group are a lot more committed to preserving Social Security and Medicare in their current forms than Republicans as a group are committed to changing them, and so the balance of public opinion is on the side of the policy status quo,” said Dr. Mark Hansen, Hutchinson Professor in Political Science and Senior Advisor to the President at the University of Chicago.
Partisanship
“As our research around the 2012 presidential election comes to a close, we can see that even though the country is divided along partisan lines on many ideas and issues, there is reason for hope,” said Kirk Wolter, Senior Fellow and Executive Vice President, Survey Research with NORC at the University of Chicago. “On the eve of the Presidential Inauguration a strong majority of the American people want to see cooperation as our leaders deal with our most pressing problems.”
Background and Methodology
This nationally representative survey of 1,125 adults was conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago in partnership with the following experts:
Professor Mark Hansen, University of Chicago
Professor Andrea Campbell, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Professor Stephen Ansolabehere, Harvard University
Professor Benjamin Page, Northwestern University
About NORC at the University of Chicago
NORC at the University of Chicago is an independent research organization with more than 70 years of leadership and experience in data collection, analysis, and dissemination. NORC supports a national field staff and international research operations collaborating with governments, educational and nonprofit organizations, and businesses to provide data and analysis that support informed decision making in health, education, economics, crime, justice, energy, security, and the environment.=====================
I don’t trust the U of Chicago, just due to the followers of Leo Strauss.
AND FYI, I am not one of The Chosen. Perhaps I am your enemy. However I sure don’t feel powerless.VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]Rating: 0 (from 0 votes) -
pnh on January 21, 2013 at 11:24 pm
My memory may be faulty — but it seems that as parts of the ACA go into effect people are becoming more in favor of it.
I’m waiting to see how the war over Medicaid expansion goes in Texas. In recent months — hospital districts have been publishing a lot of data showing that even after full federal coverage ends — many counties would still actually be saving money.
Hospitals and some big insurance companies want the expansion — so — it’s going to be an interesting fight since the GOP is standing firm in it’s refusal. I can’t wait to see how it plays out closer to election time — want to see if hospitals and insurance companies maybe start spending money against Republicans.
VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]Rating: +1 (from 1 vote) -
Uniformityville_horror on January 24, 2013 at 8:57 pm
I think it is far better to sit back, to watch and wait. The process in Canada is still unfolding. It is still evolving, with positives and negatives in full play.
I will not be engaged in it at all!!
I will go without medical care before I ask my government to take care of me. My life is none of their business. I have lived without government handouts thus far, including education (all nine years of it). I will not be starting now.That is nine years of college, BTW. I didn’t count the 12 years of public schools.
VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)-
pnh on January 24, 2013 at 11:22 pm
I wonder why it is that the majority of people in this country seem to define “handouts” in ways that exclude all the benefits they’ve received via government.
The natural resources some of us claim as our private property is a government handout — even though people pay somebody else for it. Ownership of it is based on a body of people who claimed authority to give or sell it — with the government handing out supposed legal claims and rights to it. It isn’t rightfully anybody’s — the price we set on it is arbitrary and therefore not necessarily just — so — even if we give up something in exchange for it it’s no more rightfully earned than somebody’s food stamp “handout.” Land and other resources belong to no one and everyone — so — not only is the government handing it out to people — it’s handing out something it has no actual right to give. Food stamps — on the other hand — are man’s creation — created with natural resources to trade for other resources. There is a greater right for a government to hand people food even if they don’t pay for it than there is for the government to hand people land no matter how much they pay for it.
The government is essentially taking care of everybody. I don’t know if there’s any way to live in this country without having the government helping to take care of you in some degree.
Is there any place on this planet somebody can go and live and not have any government taking care of them in some degree? Even the few remaining people living in primitive conditions are being protected by governments that don’t allow others to appropriate all of the land they live on or use all of the resources they depend on.
VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
-
Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

4 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://www.timbuk3.com/discuss/wp-trackback.php?p=9241