ISIS releases horrifying sex slave pamphlet, justifies child rape
Al Frum's (former Republican) take on "Why the Democratic Party Acts The Way It Does
"Impurifying our precious bodily fluids"
(Published December 5, 2001 by "Reason", a Libertarian magazine).
On balance the scientific evidence seems to indicate that fluoridation is a safe and effective way to prevent tooth decay. Of course, that doesn't mean that future studies will not identify problems--research is always subject to revision. However it is highly likely that, after 50 years of use by millions of people, any truly major health problems resulting from fluoridation would already have made themselves evident.
Bernie Sanders, my favorite Senator, says what I've been thinking, but didn't know how to put into words.
Bush’s ‘disastrous blunder’ created Islamic State
Warning, link is to the RW Moonie Times. Most of the story is below if you don't want to give them click-throughs.
"We are here today because of the disastrous blunder of the Bush-Cheney era, which got us into this war in Iraq in the first place, which then developed the can of worms that we’re trying to deal with right now.”
Mr. Sanders expressed his concern about the possibility of getting dragged into “perpetual warfare.”
“We have been at war for 12 years; we have spent trillions of dollars. I’m chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs. We have 500,000 men and women who have come home with PTSD and TBI [traumatic brain injuries]. What I do not want, and what I fear very much, is the United States getting sucked into a quagmire and being involved in perpetual warfare year after year after year. That is my fear,” he said."
Crazy fuckers in the middle east, at it again. For not the first time in what, 3,000 years?
Air raid sirens in Tel Aviv as Hamas declares all Israelis targets
For discussion: would Obama/a Democratic POTUS or a GOP/teabagger POTUS be more likely to intervene in a century's old religious war?
Please be prepared to defend you answer when Obama doesn't commit US troops to this crazy ass-ed eons old religious war. Bonus points if you can find a GOP POTUS who DIDN'T "come to the aid of Israel" in a similar situation.
Jews vote for Democrats, and the GOP would love to absorb them into their hateful fold.
Nothing in the past few decades has eroded America's credibility, its standing in the world, its capacity to go to war, like the war in Iraq. We expended billions upon billions of dollars and thousands of human lives in pursuit of showing off how tough we were, and the result was a disaster.
In the 2008 U.S. presidential campaign, candidates Representatives Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich, then-Senator Barack Obama (Now President of the United States), Senators Chris Dodd, Hillary Clinton and Mike Gravel were some of the most outspoken critics of the Iraq War.
Other than the Pauls, who are right about this like a stopped clock (and wrong about pretty much everything else), and are libertarians
, not Republicans, has any Republican ever expressed regret for support Bush and Cheney's illegal war of aggression? That slimy little weasel Lindsey Graham and John "bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iraq" McCain (or is that John "stupid enough to pick Sara Freakin' Palin as his running mate" McCain) are saying Putin's doing his thing because "Obama's too soft" on ... something. Foreign policy, maybe? Whatever, as long as the certifiably insane GOP/Teabagger party isn't to blame. For a situation that we have no control over...
Keeping Republicans out of the White House, permanently, really does matter.
But frankly, their "base" is so bug-fuck nuts, now, that anyone who could win a TeabaggerOP primary couldn't win a general election, so we got that going for us, which is nice.
I think about McCain/Palin finishing their second term, and Palin being in line to be the next POTUS and my mind wobbles...
(Reuters) - President Hamid Karzai appeared to stiffen his resolve on Saturday not to sign a security pact with Washington, saying the United States should leave Afghanistan unless it could restart peace talks with the Taliban. "In exchange for this agreement, we want peace for the people of Afghanistan. Otherwise, it's better for them to leave and our country will find its own way," Karzai told a news conference.
The president said pressing ahead with talks with the Taliban, in power from 1996-2001, was critical to ensure that Afghanistan was not left with a weak central government. "Starting peace talks is a condition because we want to be confident that after the signing of the security agreement, Afghanistan will not be divided into fiefdoms," he said.
Most diplomats now agree that Karzai is unlikely to sign the Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) that would allow for some form of U.S. military presence in Afghanistan after the end of 2014, when most troops are due to leave.
Seems like a non-starter, to me, given that the Taliban are some of the most fanatical religious fanatics extant
(maybe excepting the wahabees and bible-belt baptists), but we'll see how bad the MIC wants to keep using Afgonistan as a cash cow.
US the biggest threat to world peace in 2013 – poll
The US has been voted as the most significant threat to world peace in a survey across 68 different countries. Anti-American sentiment was not only recorded in antagonistic countries, but also in many allied NATO partners like Turkey and Greece. A global survey conducted by the Worldwide Independent Network and Gallup at the end of 2013 revealed strong animosity towards the US’s role as the world’s policeman. Citizens across over 60 nations were asked: “Which country do you think is the greatest threat to peace in the world today?”
The US topped the list, with 24 percent of people believing America to be the biggest danger to peace. Pakistan came second, with 8 percent of the vote and was closely followed by China with 6 percent. Afghanistan, Iran, Israel and North Korea came in joint fourth place with 5 percent of the vote.
The threat from the US was rated most highly in the Middle East and North Africa, those areas most recently affected by American military intervention. Moreover, the survey showed that even Americans regard their country as a potential threat with 13 percent of them voting the US could disrupt global status quo. Latin America expressed mixed feelings towards its northerly neighbor, with Peru, Brazil and Argentina all flagging the US as the most dangerous country.
Sounds about right. Using our military to protect the interests of oil companies and the wealthy is never going to win us a bunch of friends, and the GOP threatening to crash the global economy every few months just adds (real) insult to (real) injury. We've got to find a way to crash public opinion about all the RW crap Faux Noose (and plenty of others) is selling them.
Senator Joseph Lieberman to Join Senator Jon Kyl as Co-Chair of the American Internationalism Project at the American Enterprise Institute
Nice to know we were right about this odious douchebag all along.
BTW, PNAC's office was located in the AEI building
The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was a neo-conservative think tank (1997 to 2006) that had strong ties to the American Enterprise Institute
You remember PNAC
The little prick never really tried to hide his love for war and Israel, did he?
Dumbest mistake Al Gore ever made...
Details are still sketchy, but the attack is imminent
I can probably list the journalists who I believe when they speak (or write) on one hand. Maybe two hands. Not hands and toes.
Michael Ware is one of the few, perhaps the first I'd name, who's not a shill for the corps and the war machine (is there a difference, when there's profit to be made
This is intense.
Continue reading "Michael Ware"