Jingoism 911
by ICD
That moment right
after 9/11 was so fleeting; so paved-over by everything else that followed.
But don't forget-- in that first moment-- it was the actual dead, who were
understood to have been the main victims of the attack. All of them were the
face of the loss. Not just the American ones.
Soon after, when the heroic sacrifice of the first-responders was realized; the
face of the loss shifted. A Russian-constructivist-looking iconic image of a
white male firefighter replaced the variety of faces of the entire dead. Still,
the heroism was recognizably universal.
Would it have been less a tragedy the majority of the 3,000 dead were French? If
French firefighters had given the ultimate sacrifice? No. It was a tragedy
against Common decency. Not just some uniquely American variety.
When much fuss was made about the crucifix-shaped chunk of metal impaled at
Ground Zero; that was an attempt by one group to claim the attack for
themselves. And if that impression had prevailed; perhaps the overall response
would have galvanized along religious line, echoing Israel conflicts. A
coalition of Christians might have emerged. But that's not what transpired.
What occurred was Bush wrapping 9/11 in the American flag; to draw the lines
between Us and Them. Sure, some lip-service was given to saying 9/11 was an
attack on the whole civilized world. But more passion was put into making it
all-about America. The UN was shunned. The Axis of Evil was invented to draw
lines between US and 3 more foreign enemies. Canadians and Mexicans inside our
borders were treated as suspects, not allies.
Bush used the word 'decency' several times in his speech of September 8, 2003.
Having now desperately found a use for the rest of the world; Bush
re-characterizes 9/11 in universal terms. Yet he also clings to the very useful
nationalistic rhetoric.
Given the terror attacks from Jakarta to Bali; it's past time for Americans to
truly relinquish the dubious comforts of clinging to a red, white, and blue
security-blanket. And start seeing events in broader terms.
Also note that the primary image of 'hero' has shifted from firefighter to
soldier. For example, note the boost to credibility that comes from a political
candidate being a veteran. Fair enough. But note that there isn't similar
standing-esteem for the prospect of a firefighter candidate. You don't see
ex-fire chiefs being interviewed as experts on every TV channel, like generals.
And the policeman's share of the acclaim has diminished even-further. In the US,
the hunt for bin Laden is characterized as a military mission; not a police
dragnet, or detective mystery, or hot pursuit, or Long Arm of the Law at work.
Contrast this against Europe, where a reliance on police procedures has had
strong results in netting wanted al Qaeda figures.
National pride and militaristic solutions have their place. But an overly-narrow
view does not serve our interests well.